Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ice cream machines and ice candy machines, classified under Heading 8419, were excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 dated 1-3-1986 by the exclusion relating to refrigerating and air-conditioning machinery and appliances.
Analysis: The notification extended exemption to specified goods in the Annexure but excluded refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances, machinery, and accessories. The goods in dispute were not classified under Heading 8418 as refrigerators or refrigerating equipment; they stood classified under Heading 8419 as machinery for the treatment of materials by a process involving change of temperature. Since the exclusion clause was directed to refrigerating machinery and goods falling under the specified excluded headings, the goods classified under Heading 8419 could not be brought within that exclusion merely because they involved cooling in their process.
Conclusion: The goods were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86, and the departmental objection failed.
Final Conclusion: The exemption was available to the disputed goods, and the departmental appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are classified under a tariff heading not covered by the express exclusion in an exemption notification, they cannot be denied exemption by enlarging the exclusion beyond its clear terms.