Exemption for processed cotton cloth on exempted powerlooms turns on the notification's text, not ownership of the looms.

Exemption under the relevant notification applied to processed cotton cloth manufactured in the specified exempted powerloom category, and the benefit was not conditioned on the claimant's ownership of the looms. The notification, read with the departmental clarification and contemporaneous executive note, showed that the exemption attached to the goods and to production in powerloom factories with fewer than five powerlooms and no roller locker machines. On that construction, cloth produced on exempted powerlooms and later processed with the aid of power did not attract additional excise duty or handloom cess, and the demand could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether processed cotton cloth manufactured on exempted powerlooms was entitled to exemption from additional excise duty and handloom cess under the relevant notification, and whether ownership of the powerlooms by the claimant was a condition for claiming the exemption.

Analysis: The relevant notification exempted processed cotton cloth manufactured on handlooms or by or on behalf of the same person in powerloom factories with less than five powerlooms and no roller locker machines. The text of the notification, read with the departmental clarification and the contemporaneous executive note, showed that the exemption attached to the goods and to the exempted category of powerloom production, not to the claimant's ownership of the looms. The clarification issued by the department was treated as a valid guide to the intended scope of the exemption and supported the view that cloth produced on exempted powerlooms and later processed with the aid of power did not attract additional excise duty or handloom cess.

Conclusion: The exemption was available to the processed cotton cloth in question and ownership of the powerlooms was not a necessary condition.

Final Conclusion: The demand of handloom cess could not be sustained, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be construed according to its text and contemporaneous departmental exposition, and where the notification attaches the benefit to processed goods manufactured in an exempted powerloom category, the claimant need not show ownership of the powerlooms unless the notification expressly so requires.

---