Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an engineer who occasionally visited the premises to supervise production could be treated as a worker for determining whether the unit crossed the statutory threshold of ten workers and, consequently, whether the assessee was entitled to exemption from licensing control and duty.
Analysis: The concept of factory under the Factories Act, 1948 was restored by Notification No. 92/81-C.E. dated 01.04.1981, making the statutory definition in Section 2(m) relevant. The material question was whether ten or more workers were working in the premises with the aid of power. The assessee had admitted the presence of nine workers, and the dispute turned on whether the visiting engineer could be counted as a worker. Applying Section 2(1) of the Factories Act, 1948, the engineer's supervision of manufacturing activity, specification, standard and quality was treated as work connected with the manufacturing process and not merely administrative activity.
Conclusion: The engineer was rightly treated as a worker for the purpose of the statutory threshold, the unit fell within the definition of factory, and the exemption was not available.
Ratio Decidendi: A person engaged in supervising and controlling the manufacturing process within the premises may fall within the statutory definition of worker if the work is connected with the manufacturing process and is relevant to the factory threshold under the Factories Act, 1948.