Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic waste and scrap arising in the course of manufacture, cleared at nil rate of duty, constituted final products so as to require reversal of Modvat credit under Rule 57C, or whether such waste was covered by Rule 57D, preserving the credit on inputs contained in it.
Analysis: The plastic waste did not constitute the final product of the manufacture; it was only waste or a by-product. Rule 57C applies where the final product is chargeable to nil rate of duty, whereas Rule 57D protects Modvat credit when inputs are contained in by-products or waste. Since the waste and scrap cleared by the appellant was not the final product, the credit taken on the inputs could not be reduced or denied merely because part of the inputs was present in the waste.
Conclusion: Rule 57C was held inapplicable and the Modvat credit was not required to be reversed. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.