Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the shares acquired by the assessee in satisfaction of the loan transaction were held as a capital investment or as a trading asset acquired in the course of its money-lending business, so as to entitle the assessee to deduction of the amount written off.
Analysis: The original advance was a financing transaction, but the subsequent acquisition of shares in the newly floated company and its managing agency company was not compelled by any security arrangement or recovery necessity. The shares were not taken as collateral for the loan, the monies used were not spare funds awaiting lending, and the acquisition was of unquoted shares in new concerns, indicating an intention to close the loan transaction and substitute it with an investment in corporate shareholding. The claimed deduction under the bad debt provision also failed because no debt remained outstanding after the conversion of the loan into shares.
Conclusion: The shares were held as capital investment and not as trading assets. The assessee was not entitled to the deduction claimed, and the question was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a money-lender converts a loan into an outright acquisition of shares not taken as security and not acquired as part of a share-trading activity, the resulting holding is a capital investment and not a business trading asset.