Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service of notice under section 24B(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, on the widow alone, where the deceased assessee's minor son was also a legal representative, was valid in law and amounted to compliance with the statutory requirement.
Analysis: The deceased assessee left behind the widow, a minor son and a daughter, but the widow and the son alone were the legal representatives for the relevant estate share. The Income-tax Department knew that the son was a legal representative and that he was a minor under the natural guardianship of the widow. If the notice had been addressed to the son, it would necessarily have been served through the widow as guardian. The interests of the widow and the minor son were identical in relation to the assessment proceedings, and there was no conflict of interest. In these circumstances, service on the widow alone, though not the ideal form of notice, sufficiently met the statutory requirement on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The notice was validly served and there was substantial compliance with section 24B(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; the answer was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where one legal representative is also the natural guardian of another legal representative who is a minor, and their interests are identical with no conflict, service of notice on the guardian-legal representative alone may constitute substantial compliance with the requirement of notice to the estate.