Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the cross objection was maintainable; and (ii) whether MODVAT credit on scrap purchased from the open market could be denied on the ground that it was non-duty paid scrap.
Issue (i): Whether the cross objection was maintainable.
Analysis: The cross objection was only in the nature of comments on the grounds urged in the appeal and did not independently survive as a tenable cross objection.
Conclusion: The cross objection was not maintainable and was dismissed.
Issue (ii): Whether MODVAT credit on scrap purchased from the open market could be denied on the ground that it was non-duty paid scrap.
Analysis: The scrap used by the respondents was not shown by evidence to be broken tins or any other category necessarily to be treated as non-duty paid. The Department did not establish the actual nature of the scrap or discharge the burden of proving that the inputs were non-duty paid. Mere purchase from the open market was insufficient to deny credit in the absence of proof and verification of the lots received.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit could not be denied, and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Final Conclusion: The decision affirms that, for scrap inputs claimed under the MODVAT scheme, denial of credit requires proof by the Department that the goods were non-duty paid; in the absence of such proof, the assessee is entitled to the credit.
Ratio Decidendi: The burden lies on the Department to prove that inputs on which MODVAT credit is claimed are non-duty paid, and credit cannot be denied merely because the goods were purchased from the open market.