TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a fresh legal ground not raised before the lower authorities could be taken on record at the appellate stage; (ii) Whether the withdrawal notifications became effective only on the date the Gazette was made available to the public and, if so, which date governed the applicable rate of duty for the imported goods.
Issue (i): Whether a fresh legal ground not raised before the lower authorities could be taken on record at the appellate stage.
Analysis: The fresh ground involved a pure question of law and required no new evidence. Where the necessary material is already on record, an additional ground may be entertained at the appellate stage.
Conclusion: The additional ground was rightly taken on record.
Issue (ii): Whether the withdrawal notifications became effective only on the date the Gazette was made available to the public and, if so, which date governed the applicable rate of duty for the imported goods.
Analysis: Withdrawal of exemption under a customs notification becomes enforceable only when the notification is made known to the public by release of the Gazette for sale. The goods in question were initially covered by a bill of entry for warehousing, and the bill was substituted as a bill of entry for home consumption only on 23-10-1986. Under Section 15(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, the relevant date for determining the rate of duty in such a case is the date on which the goods are entered for home consumption. Since the home consumption entry arose on 23-10-1986, the notifications withdrawing exemption were applicable.
Conclusion: The withdrawal notifications governed the assessment and the higher duty rate was correctly applied.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the duty payable had to be determined with reference to the later home consumption entry, and the exemption withdrawal was operative when that entry became effective.
Ratio Decidendi: A customs withdrawal notification takes effect only when it is made available to the public, and the rate of duty for imported goods is determined under Section 15(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 with reference to the date on which the goods are entered for home consumption.
TaxTMI 
