Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a sick industrial unit could be required to make a cash deposit or furnish a bank guarantee as a condition for hearing the appeal, and what interim protection was warranted pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The unit had been declared sick by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. In view of the protection available to a sick unit under the Sick Industries (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, cash deposit or bank guarantee was not insisted upon. Instead, the authorised representative of the company was directed to furnish an undertaking that the adjudicated dues would be met if the appeal failed. The department was also restrained from disposing of the confiscated plant and machinery and from interfering with normal production until the appeal was decided.
Outcome: The pre-deposit requirement was waived, an undertaking in lieu thereof was directed, and interim protection was granted to the appellant pending disposal of the appeal.