Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seven products manufactured by the appellants were classifiable under Heading 35.06 as prepared glues and other prepared adhesives, or under Heading 40.05 and Heading 38.23 as proposed by the Department.
Analysis: The products were examined on the basis of their composition. The first six items were found to be aqueous dispersions containing synthetic rubber, natural rubber, zinc oxide, fillers and other ingredients, but the Tribunal found that the rubber content was only about 10 to 15 per cent and that the products were more akin to the goods considered in earlier decisions on prepared adhesives and mastics. The Chemical Examiner's report, relied upon by the Department, was held insufficient to justify classification under Heading 40.05. The seventh item was a free flowing liquid composed essentially of natural resin in volatile organic solvent, and was also considered to fall with the same class of prepared adhesive products rather than under Heading 38.23.
Conclusion: All seven products were held classifiable under Heading 35.06 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the contrary classification under Heading 40.05 and Heading 38.23 was rejected.