Bulk narcotic drug classification excluded additional customs duty under the applicable levy and exemption framework.

A bulk imported narcotic drug, treated as a preparation under the relevant classification framework, was held not liable to additional duty of customs. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on similar facts and applied the same reasoning to exclude the levy where the governing exemption and classification provisions did not support additional duty. The appellate authority's non-merits approach was inconsistent with its own findings, and the substantive customs duty issue was resolved in favour of the importers, with the impugned order set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported bulk narcotic drug was liable to additional duty of customs, and whether the exemption and classification applicable to bulk drugs excluded such levy.

Analysis: The imported substance was a bulk narcotic drug and a preparation. Applying the earlier Tribunal decision on similar facts, the imported goods were treated as outside the levy of additional duty of customs. The appellate authority's failure to decide the matter on merits was inconsistent with its own findings, and the substantive question was answered by following the binding reasoning already adopted in the earlier case.

Conclusion: The product was not liable to be charged with additional duty of customs.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and relief was granted to the appellants on the substantive customs duty issue.

Ratio Decidendi: A bulk imported narcotic drug, being a preparation of the kind considered in the earlier Tribunal ruling, is not liable to additional duty of customs when the governing classification and levy provisions do not support such assessment.

---