Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amendment inserting an Explanation in Notification No. 133/86-C.E. by Notification No. 239/87-C.E. was clarificatory and could be applied to consignments cleared before the amending notification, so as to extend exemption to polystyrene moulding powder.
Analysis: Notification No. 133/86-C.E. exempted polystyrene resins under sub-heading 3903.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Notification No. 239/87-C.E. inserted an Explanation stating that the expression "resins" includes moulding powders of such resins. The amendment did not introduce a new condition or alter the scheme of exemption but only made explicit what was already implicit in the original notification. Since Chapter Note 6(a)(ii) to Chapter 39 treats moulding powder as a primary form and heading 39.03 covers polymers of styrene in primary form, polystyrene moulding powder fell within the original exemption itself.
Conclusion: The Explanation was clarificatory and applied to goods cleared before its issue. The refund claim was maintainable, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A clarificatory amendment to an exemption notification may apply to earlier clearances where it merely makes explicit a meaning already implicit in the original notification and does not impose any new condition.