Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were refractory bricks classifiable under Heading 69.01/02 and entitled to exemption under Notification No. 242/76-Cus., dated 2-8-1976.
Analysis: The description in the invoice and bill of entry described the goods as fused silica refractory, and the supplier's literature described them as castable refractory, a blended mixture of fused silica aggregate with a high purity binder. The literature also indicated shipment in sacks, which supported the conclusion that the goods were imported in powder or granule form rather than as bricks. On that material, the finding that the goods were refractory bricks could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 69.01/02 was held to be incorrect, and the claim to exemption on that basis did not survive. The appeal was allowed in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The imported goods were not accepted as refractory bricks, and the departmental challenge to the classification order succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Classification of imported goods must follow their actual description and commercial character as disclosed by the invoice, bill of entry, and supporting technical literature, and exemption dependent on a specific classification cannot be granted when that classification is not established.