Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was bound to disclose, in his own assessment, capital gains arising to his from assets transferred by him to her so as to justify reassessment under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Income arising to a spouse from assets transferred by the assessee without adequate consideration is includible in the assessee's total income under the clubbing provisions, and capital gains are not excluded from the term "income" for that purpose. However, the obligation under the reassessment provisions is tied to the assessee's duty to disclose fully and truly all primary material facts necessary for assessment. Once the assessee has disclosed the transfer of assets to the spouse, the inference whether any further income, including capital gains, arose from those assets is for the assessing authority to draw. The mere omission to state that the spouse later realised capital gains does not amount to nondisclosure of material facts by the assessee.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was not validly assumed, because there was no failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessee is not required to disclose, as a separate material fact, income of a spouse that is merely includible in the assessee's hands by operation of the clubbing provisions, where the primary fact of transfer has already been disclosed.