Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of goods manufactured by an independent unit for a loan licensee, out of raw materials supplied by the assessee, could be treated as clearances on behalf of the assessee and added to the assessee's own clearances for computing the monetary limit under Notification No. 85/85.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the settled principle that in central excise law there is no concept of a "clearance on behalf of" another person and that the manufacturer is the person who actually carries out the manufacturing activity. Goods made by an independent licensed manufacturer cannot be shifted to the account of the raw-material supplier unless it is established that the supplier itself was conducting the manufacture under its own supervision and control by hiring the factory premises and equipment. As the Department led no evidence that the assessee had such control over the outside unit's operations, the clearances of that unit could not be clubbed with the assessee's own factory clearances.
Conclusion: The outside unit's clearances could not be added to the assessee's clearances, and the assessee remained within the exemption limit under Notification No. 85/85.
Ratio Decidendi: For central excise exemption purposes, goods manufactured by an independent unit are assessable as the clearances of the actual manufacturer unless the alleged beneficiary is shown to have itself undertaken the manufacturing activity under its own supervision and control.