Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported running computer sheets in source code form were classifiable as printed books for the purpose of exemption under Customs Notification No. 139/90 dated 20-3-1990.
Analysis: The goods were found to fall within Chapter Note 4(c) to Chapter 49, which covers printed parts of books in the form of assembled or separate sheets constituting the whole or part of a complete work and designed for binding. The term "printed books" in the notification was not separately defined, and its meaning was therefore to be gathered from the tariff schedule. Since the goods were treated as printed books for tariff classification, there was no reason to deny the same character for the exemption notification. The notification was not shown to indicate any contrary intention, and the expression used in it was held to bear the same meaning as in the parent enactment and schedule, supported by Section 20 of the General Clauses Act.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held eligible for exemption under the notification, and the denial of auxiliary duty benefit was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned customs order was reversed, granting the consequential relief claimed by the importer.
Ratio Decidendi: An expression used in an exemption notification issued under a statute ordinarily carries the same meaning as in the parent Act or tariff schedule, unless the notification shows a contrary intention.