Incidental appellate power to stay recovery can protect an appeal from being rendered ineffective after provisional release of goods.

An appellate tribunal may exercise incidental and ancillary power to stay recovery proceedings where immediate enforcement would render the pending appeal ineffective, especially after confiscated goods have been provisionally released on bond and security. The Tribunal treated continued recovery in those circumstances as capable of defeating the appellate remedy and granted interim protection where a strong prima facie case was shown. Recovery proceedings in the specified manner were restrained during the appeal, while the Revenue was left free to enforce the bond if otherwise permissible.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could exercise inherent or incidental power to stay recovery proceedings arising from a confiscation order where the goods had already been provisionally released and a strong prima facie case was shown.

Analysis: The order of confiscation had proceeded on goods that were no longer physically available because they had been provisionally released on bond and security, with the redemption fine partly appropriated from the security and the balance sought to be recovered. In such circumstances, the Tribunal treated the situation as one where insistence on immediate recovery could render the appeal ineffective. Relying on the principle that appellate jurisdiction carries with it ancillary powers necessary to make the remedy effective, and that stay may be granted in deserving cases to prevent the appeal from being rendered nugatory, the Tribunal held that it had power to grant interim relief. It also found, prima facie, that the appellants had a good case on merits.

Conclusion: The stay application was allowed and recovery proceedings in the manner proposed by the Revenue were restrained during pendency of the appeal, while leaving the Revenue free to enforce the B-11 bond if otherwise permissible.

Final Conclusion: Interim protection was granted in aid of the pending appeal, and the Revenue was prevented from pursuing the specified recovery route during the appeal period.

Ratio Decidendi: An appellate tribunal may exercise incidental and ancillary power to grant stay where necessary to protect the efficacy of the appeal and prevent recovery proceedings from defeating the appellate remedy, especially when the appellant shows a strong prima facie case.

---