Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit under the transitional provisions of Rule 57H could be allowed in respect of scrap cleared before filing the declaration under Rule 57G, where the ship had been received for breaking and used as an input in the manufacture of scrap.
Analysis: Rule 57H was treated as a transitional provision intended to extend relief even after the MODVAT scheme had come into force. The expression "immediately before" was read as meaning "preceding the date", so that inputs received before the dated acknowledgement of the Rule 57G declaration could still qualify if they were used in the manufacture of final products cleared on or after 1 March 1987. On the facts, the ship brought for breaking was regarded as the relevant input, and the scrap generated from it was the final product. The benefit could therefore not be denied merely because clearance had commenced before the declaration was filed.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit under Rule 57H was admissible for the disputed clearances, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit.