Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether television cabinets bearing the brand name or trade name of another person were entitled to small-scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 223/87-C.E.
Analysis: The amended notification inserted paragraph 7 and Explanation VIII, under which the exemption does not apply where the specified goods are affixed with the brand name or trade name of another person who is not eligible for the exemption. The definition is broad and covers any name or mark used in relation to specified goods to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods and the person using that name or mark. The television cabinets were specified goods and the brand names affixed on them indicated such a trade connection with another manufacturer, so the clarification relied upon by the respondents could not override the plain wording of the notification.
Conclusion: The television cabinets were not entitled to the small-scale exemption, and the Revenue's appeals succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The exemption was denied because the goods carried another person's brand name within the meaning of the amended notification, making the manufacturers ineligible for the benefit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a small-scale exemption notification excludes specified goods bearing another person's brand name or trade name, the exemption is unavailable if the mark used indicates a connection in the course of trade with that other person.