Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declared invoice value of the imported polystyrene resin could be rejected and enhanced for customs valuation, or whether the transaction value had to be accepted under the valuation rules.
Analysis: The Customs authorities relied on comparable import prices and treated the declared price as inconsistent with the market, but no basis was established for the assumption that high impact polystyrene was necessarily costlier than general purpose polystyrene. There was also no finding of any remittance of foreign exchange abroad or any relationship between the supplier and the importer. The material on record, including contemporaneous invoices and the supplier's certificate indicating the declared price and later reduction in price, supported the appellants' declared value. In these circumstances, the transaction value could not be discarded merely on speculative comparison with other imports.
Conclusion: The declared value was required to be accepted under Section 14(1A) read with Rule 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, and the enhancement of assessable value was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no relationship, abnormal consideration, or reliable contrary evidence is shown, the declared transaction value of imported goods must be accepted for customs valuation and cannot be rejected on unsupported comparison with other import prices.