Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Clause 10 of the auction conditions required the increase or reduction in export duty on the date of auction to be shared between the Board and the exporter when the 45-day period expressly included the date of auction.
Analysis: The clause provided for sharing any increase or reduction in taxes, duties, and imposts occurring within 45 days from the auction date, and it specifically stated that the day of auction was included in that period. The reserve price was fixed on the basis of the duty prevalent up to the day before the auction, and the contractual scheme was designed to adjust for fluctuations in duty during the specified period. Since the export duty was reduced on the date of auction itself, that date fell within the contractual 45-day period. The contention that the reduction should be treated as operative only from the midnight preceding the date was rejected because it would defeat the express inclusive wording of the clause.
Conclusion: The reduction in export duty on the date of auction was within the contractual period and was shareable under Clause 10, so the exporters were not entitled to refund of the amount paid.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a contract expressly includes the date of auction in the relevant period, any change in duty on that date falls within the period and must be given effect according to the contractual sharing mechanism.