Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plaster of paris obtained from gypsum by washing, crushing, grinding, roasting and calcination was classifiable under Heading 2505 of the Central Excise Tariff and consequently liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 25 covers only products obtained by washing, crushing, grinding and other mechanical or physical processes, and expressly excludes products that have been roasted, calcined or obtained by mixing. The product in question was admittedly obtained by roasting and calcination. On that basis, it fell outside Heading 2505. The Department did not discharge the burden of establishing the proposed classification. In view of this finding, the claim for exemption under Notification No. 217/86 did not arise for examination.
Conclusion: The product was not classifiable under Heading 2505 and was not excisable on the basis adopted by the Department; the demand could not be sustained, and the appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted in the impugned order was set aside and the assessee obtained consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff note expressly excludes goods obtained by roasting or calcination, a product so obtained cannot be brought within the covered heading merely because it is derived from a mineral covered in the tariff description.