Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an individual partner can set off his share of the loss of an unregistered firm against his share of profits from registered firms of the same year in computing his taxable income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The governing scheme under the 1922 Act treats registered and unregistered firms differently for tax purposes. Although firm losses may be dealt with at the firm level under the relevant provisions governing assessment, set-off, and carry-forward, the partner of an unregistered firm cannot claim a second benefit by adjusting the same loss again against his own income or against his share of profits from registered firms. The court held that the proviso relied upon by the petitioners could not be extended beyond its intended field, and that allowing such a set-off would create an impermissible double advantage. The later statutory position under section 77 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was also noted as consistent with this view.
Conclusion: The partner is not entitled to set off his share of loss from an unregistered firm against his share of profits from registered firms for the same year; the contention was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A partner in an unregistered firm cannot claim set-off of the firm's loss against his personal income or against profits from registered firms where the statutory scheme already provides for assessment and carry-forward of the firm's loss.