Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of solubilised vats cleared during the preceding year under a full exemption notification was to be excluded while computing the aggregate value of clearances for eligibility under Notification No. 80/80-C.E., and whether the assessee was entitled to exemption for synthetic resins for the relevant year.
Analysis: The clearances of solubilised vats were made without payment of duty under Notification No. 180/61-C.E. The relevant explanation to Notification No. 80/80-C.E. provided that clearances of specified goods exempted from the whole of duty under another notification in force were not to be taken into account for computing the aggregate value of clearances. On that basis, the value of solubilised vats had to be excluded. Once excluded, the assessee's clearances for the preceding financial year fell below the monetary limit prescribed in paragraph 4(i) of Notification No. 80/80-C.E. The later deletion of solubilised vats by Notification No. 106/82-C.E. was held to be without retrospective effect and did not alter their status for the earlier year.
Conclusion: The exclusion of the value of solubilised vats from the aggregate turnover computation was , and the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 80/80-C.E. for synthetic resins.