Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether heat shrinkable sleeves imported against Defence Ministry-certified orders were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 206/76-Customs as radar spares and accessories, or whether they were to be treated as raw material and denied exemption.
Analysis: The import documents, Defence Ministry certificate, annexed list and supplier catalogue showed that the goods were identified by specific part numbers, ordered in quantified pieces of 1.2 metres each, and described as cable accessories for direct use in cable assembly for defence purposes. The finding that the goods were merely running-length raw material was inconsistent with the documentary record and with the manner in which the goods were ordered and certified for exclusive defence use. A new factual contention that the sleeves were of general-purpose use was not entertained since it had not formed the basis of the original order under challenge.
Conclusion: The heat shrinkable sleeves were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 206/76-Customs and the department's objection that they were raw material was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are specifically identified by part number, ordered in discrete quantities for certified defence use, and shown to be cable accessories for direct application, they cannot be denied exemption merely by characterising them as raw material.