Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty-paid inputs used in an integrated manufacturing process remained eligible for set-off under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. even though intermediate products came into existence before the final excisable goods were manufactured.
Analysis: The notification allowed exemption where goods falling under Tariff Item 68 had been used in the manufacture of the final excisable goods. The reasoning adopted in the cited authorities was that the inputs need not form an integral physical part of the finished product or pass directly into it. Where manufacture is carried out through an integrated process, intermediate stages do not break the nexus between the duty-paid inputs and the final product. Processes that are ancillary or incidental to manufacture are within the scope of manufacture, and goods used in such a process may still qualify as raw materials or component parts for the end product. On that footing, the chemicals used in the manufacture of laminated sheets were treated as eligible inputs notwithstanding the emergence of resin, treated paper, and treated fabrics at intermediate stages.
Conclusion: The set-off under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. was admissible, and the demand could not be sustained.