Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit on lacquered sheets could be denied on the ground that the plain tin sheets were sent directly for lacquering without strict compliance with the prescribed procedure, and whether the duty element on the plain sheets could be correlated with the lacquered sheets received as the declared input.
Analysis: The declaration had been filed for lacquered tin sheets, and the dispute turned on whether the credit availed represented duty paid on the declared lacquered sheets. The duty on the plain tin sheets, which were later lacquered, was treated as the relevant duty component, and no additional duty was shown to have been charged on the lacquering process. On that footing, the decisive enquiry was whether the documentary evidence established a proper correlation between the duty paid on the plain sheets and the lacquered sheets received in the factory. The procedural objection regarding the manner of sending the sheets for lacquering and the delay in filing extracts could not, by itself, resolve the entitlement without examining that correlation.
Conclusion: The denial of MODVAT credit was set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo verification of correlation and documentary proof. The assessee was given an opportunity to substantiate entitlement to credit before the lower authority.