Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the products manufactured by the assessee were "perfumed hair oils" falling within Tariff Item 14F(ii) and therefore excisable.
Analysis: The products were manufactured from herbal ingredients and a small quantity of sandalwood oil was added only to preserve the odour and prevent rancidity. The materials on record, including the technical opinion and the Ayurvedic authority's view, showed that the fragrance came from the Ayurvedic ingredients and not from any perfume deliberately imparted to the oils. A product can be treated as perfumed only where perfume is added by a positive and deliberate act; incidental preservation of odour does not convert an Ayurvedic preparation into a perfumed hair oil. The tariff entry, even though inclusive, covers preparations that are actually toilet or cosmetic preparations or are equivalent to such products, and the department failed to establish that these oils answered that description.
Conclusion: The products were not perfumed hair oils and were not classifiable under Tariff Item 14F(ii); the demand could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For a product to fall within a tariff entry for perfumed hair oils, perfume must be deliberately imparted so as to make the article a perfumed preparation, and not merely added incidentally for preservation or anti-rancidity purposes.