Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a loan advanced by a company to a shareholder could be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 when the existence of accumulated profits depended upon the manner of computing depreciation.
Analysis: For the purpose of section 2(6A)(e), accumulated profits must be ascertained by determining profits in the sense recognised by the Income-tax Act, which requires depreciation to be deducted at the rates allowable under that Act. The computation cannot be controlled merely by figures shown in the company's balance-sheet or by depreciation worked out on another statutory basis. On the agreed material, application of Income-tax Act depreciation rates showed that the company had no accumulated profits at the relevant time and, instead, unabsorbed depreciation remained to be carried forward.
Conclusion: The loan could not be brought to tax as a deemed dividend under section 2(6A)(e) because the company had no accumulated profits.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, accumulated profits must be computed on the basis of profits determined under the Income-tax Act after allowing depreciation at the rates permissible under that Act, and not merely on balance-sheet figures or depreciation worked out under another regime.