Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported step and repeat machine was correctly classifiable under Heading 84.40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 instead of Heading 90.10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on identical goods and found no reason to depart from the view already taken. The arguments supporting classification under Heading 90.10 were rejected for the same reasons adopted in the earlier orders.
Conclusion: The machine was classifiable under Heading 84.40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and not under Heading 90.10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The assessee succeeded on the classification issue.