Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether stamp duty on an amalgamation order was required to be determined by reference to the valuation prevailing on the date of the National Company Law Tribunal's approval of the scheme, rather than an earlier valuation report.
Analysis: For stamp-duty purposes, the instrument was the order approving the amalgamation. The statutory framework required consideration of the instrument and the relevant valuation connected with the amalgamation. Reliance solely on a valuation dated 23.02.2018, preceding the National Company Law Tribunal's approval dated 06.05.2019, was insufficient to conclusively determine the duty. At the same time, the petitioner had not furnished satisfactory valuation material prepared during the amalgamation process or at the time of approval. A fresh determination therefore required consideration of the additional valuation material and the petitioner's earlier response, following an opportunity of personal hearing.
Conclusion: Stamp duty could not be conclusively determined on the basis of the earlier valuation dated 23.02.2018 alone.