Intermediate liquor job work qualifies for service tax exemption, while return-filing late fees and separate interest remain payable.

Liquor-related repacking, bottle cleaning and barcode-sticking operations may qualify as exempt intermediate job work where they form part of the manufacture or finishing process and enable marketable completion of the final product. The exemption applies when such processes are undertaken for a principal manufacturer paying the applicable State Excise Duty, treating bottling and packaging operations as within manufacture. However, late fees and separately accrued interest for delayed return filing remain independently payable where the filing default and liability are established, despite the service tax demand, related interest and penalty being set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appellant's activities of repacking, repackaging, bottle cleaning and barcode sticking in relation to liquor amounted to an intermediate production process as job work eligible for exemption under Serial No. 30(c) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST; (ii) Whether the confirmed late fee and interest were sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether the appellant's activities of repacking, repackaging, bottle cleaning and barcode sticking in relation to liquor amounted to an intermediate production process as job work eligible for exemption under Serial No. 30(c) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST.

Analysis: The activities undertaken by the appellant were found to form part of the production and finishing cycle of liquor and to facilitate completion of the final product for marketability. The expression "job work" was understood in the sense of processing or working upon raw material or semi-finished goods so as to complete part of the process resulting in manufacture or finishing of an article, including operations essential to that process. Reliance was placed on the view that bottling and packaging of liquor fall within the ambit of manufacture, and that liquor-related intermediate processes undertaken for a principal manufacturer paying appropriate State Excise Duty satisfy the exemption condition in the notification.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and the service tax demand, interest and penalty under the impugned order were set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether the confirmed late fee and interest were sustainable.

Analysis: The record showed delay in filing the relevant returns, and the appellant had also accepted liability for the post-withdrawal period. The late fee and the small amount of interest were treated as independently payable notwithstanding the setting aside of the service tax demand.

Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and the late fee and interest were upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of the service tax demand, interest and penalty, but failed in relation to the late fee and the separate interest component, resulting in a partial relief to the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: An intermediate job-work process that forms part of the manufacture or finishing of liquor, including bottling-related operations essential to marketable completion, qualifies for exemption under the relevant mega exemption notification; separate statutory late fee and interest remain enforceable where return-filing defaults are established.

---