Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notice for reopening of assessment for A.Y. 2012-13 under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when it was founded on investigation material referring to another entity, namely Royal Arcade Private, without any demonstrated connection between that entity and the petitioner.
Analysis: The reopening was initiated nearly six years after the relevant assessment year on the basis of investigation material comprising the statement of an alleged accommodation entry provider and an email from the Investigation Wing. The recorded basis referred to Royal Arcade Private as the beneficiary entity. The petitioner specifically objected that it was not Royal Arcade Private and had no connection with that entity. No material was shown establishing that the petitioner was the said entity or was otherwise linked to it. The objections order also failed to deal with this foundational objection, and the affidavit in reply remained silent on the absence of such link. In these circumstances, the reassessment lacked the necessary factual nexus between the information relied upon and the petitioner sought to be reassessed.
Conclusion: The notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessment was invalid and was quashed, in favour of the assessee.