Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT Circular dated 17.09.2024 applies to a pending revenue appeal, and whether an exception introduced later by the CBDT Circular dated 15.03.2024 can be invoked to continue an appeal filed before that exception came into force.
Analysis: The applicable legal framework was the CBDT regime governing monetary limits for departmental appeals and the exceptions carved out thereunder. The High Court followed its earlier precedents holding that revised monetary limits apply even to pending appeals. It also applied the settled position that exceptions introduced by later circulars operate prospectively and cannot validate prosecution of an appeal already filed before such exception was introduced. Since the appeal had been filed on 10.04.2023 and the exception relied upon by the Revenue was introduced only on 15.03.2024, that exception was unavailable for this appeal. The separate contention that the case did not fall within the TDS/TCS exception was expressly left open and not decided.
Conclusion: The revised monetary limit under the CBDT Circular dated 17.09.2024 governed the pending appeal, the later exception introduced on 15.03.2024 was inapplicable to an appeal already filed on 10.04.2023, and the appeal was therefore disposed of on the ground that the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit.
Ratio Decidendi: Revised CBDT monetary-limit circulars apply to pending departmental appeals, but exceptions introduced by a later circular operate only prospectively and cannot be invoked for appeals instituted before the date of such exception.