Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notice for reassessment issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was valid when sanction under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of the authority prescribed for cases falling beyond three years.
Analysis: The reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2019-20 was issued on 12.04.2023, which fell beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The approval record itself stated that the case was covered by Section 149(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, namely a case of more than three years but not more than ten years. For such cases, Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner, Principal Director General, Chief Commissioner, or Director General. The sanction, however, was granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, who was not the prescribed sanctioning authority for that period category. The defect went to jurisdiction, rendering the approval inconsistent with Section 151 and invalid.
Conclusion: The sanction for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid; consequently, the reassessment notice and all subsequent proceedings, including the assessment framed pursuant thereto, were without jurisdiction and void ab initio. The issue is decided in favour of the assessee.