Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2018-19 was liable to be set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication on the ground of inadequate opportunity and service of notices at an old address.
Analysis: The petitioner showed that the premises where notices were served had been sold prior to issuance of notice under Section 148A, and the petition also proceeded on the assertion that the petitioner was abroad during the relevant period. Although there was an admission that the change of address was not communicated to the department, the challenge was confined to seeking an opportunity to contest the assessment on merits. In these circumstances, the Court found the request bona fide and considered that the interests of justice would be served by reopening the matter before the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision in accordance with law, with liberty to the petitioner to file a response and without requiring issuance of a fresh show cause notice.