Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of unutilized Education Cess, Secondary and Higher Education Cess, and Krishi Kalyan Cess lying in credit as on 30.06.2017 was admissible under the transitional refund provisions of the CGST regime.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that there was no provision under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to merge the blocked cesses with Excise Duty or Service Tax or to claim them as refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It was held that Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applied only to refunds arising from export of goods and services and had no application to refund of the blocked cesses. The Tribunal further accepted that the cesses had become dead credit before the GST regime and that, where the refund was not admissible in the first place, no claim could arise under the transitional provisions of the CGST Act, 2017.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable and was rejected.