Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether investment advisory services provided to an overseas entity constituted export of service so as to entitle the appellant to refund of unutilized CENVAT credit.
Analysis: The services were rendered under an agreement with the foreign recipient, invoiced in convertible foreign exchange, and there was no agreement or direct service obligation towards customers in India. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that investment advisory and related research services supplied to an overseas entity are used outside India when the recipient is abroad and the service is not rendered to Indian clients on its behalf. On that basis, the requirement of export of service was held to be satisfied, making the accumulated credit refundable under the refund scheme.
Conclusion: The services qualified as export of service and the refund of accumulated CENVAT credit was admissible to the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with the refund claim restored in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Investment advisory services supplied to an overseas recipient for consideration in foreign exchange constitute export of service where the service is not provided to Indian clients on the foreign recipient's behalf and the effective use of the service is with the foreign recipient.