Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reimbursable amounts could be included in the gross value for charging service tax for the period prior to the amendment to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The dispute concerned valuation of taxable services under the category of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that reimbursable expenditure is not part of the taxable value for the period before the legislative amendment made effective from 14 May 2015. The amendment to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 was treated as a substantive change operating prospectively, and the pre-amendment period could not be subjected to service tax on reimbursable amounts.
Conclusion: Reimbursable amounts were not includible in the taxable value for the disputed period, and the demand could not be sustained against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief in law.
Ratio Decidendi: An amendment expanding the taxable value of service tax to include reimbursable expenditure operates prospectively and cannot be applied to periods prior to its commencement.