Tariff classification under Heading 8512 turns on whether the component itself emits the warning or signal, not merely processes data.

A component expressly covered by a specific tariff heading must be classified there: the PVC-insulated cable fitted with connectors fell within CTI 8544 42 20 and was eligible for exemption under S. No. 733 of Notification No. 69/2011-Customs. By contrast, the Unit Assembly and Controller Assembly merely captured or processed data and did not themselves generate the warning or signal required for Heading 8512. As no specific Chapter 85 heading applied to those sub-assemblies, they were classified as motor-vehicle parts under CTI 8708 99 00.

---

---

Issues: Whether (i) the Cable is classifiable as plastic insulated cable fitted with connectors under Heading 8544 and eligible for exemption, (ii) the Unit Assembly is classifiable as parts of electrical lighting or signalling equipment under Heading 8512, and (iii) the Controller Assembly is classifiable as parts of electrical lighting or signalling equipment under Heading 8512.

Issue (i): Whether the Cable is classifiable as plastic insulated cable fitted with connectors under Heading 8544 and eligible for exemption.

Analysis: The Cable was found to be a PVC-insulated electric cable fitted with connectors at both ends and specifically covered by CTI 8544 42 20. As the goods were expressly covered by Heading 8544, classification was governed by the terms of the heading read with Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI. The Cable also fell within the scope of S. No. 733 of Notification No. 69/2011-Customs, which extends to goods of the relevant sub-headings.

Conclusion: The Cable is classifiable under CTI 8544 42 20 and is eligible for exemption under S. No. 733 of Notification No. 69/2011-Customs.

Issue (ii): Whether the Unit Assembly is classifiable as parts of electrical lighting or signalling equipment under Heading 8512.

Analysis: Heading 8512 was held to cover apparatus whose primary and essential function is to generate or emit visual or audio signals to the driver. The Unit Assembly only captures visual data and transmits it for further processing, while the actual warning is emitted by external vehicle systems such as the BCM and buzzer or indicator lamp. It was therefore not treated as electrical signalling equipment, and no specific heading in Chapter 85 was found to cover it. In the absence of such specific coverage, the item was considered classifiable as a motor-vehicle part under Heading 8708, and not under CTI 8512 90 00.

Conclusion: The Unit Assembly is not classifiable under CTI 8512 90 00 and is classifiable under CTI 8708 99 00.

Issue (iii): Whether the Controller Assembly is classifiable as parts of electrical lighting or signalling equipment under Heading 8512.

Analysis: The Controller Assembly was held to perform only intermediate processing and transmission of data, without itself generating a warning or signal. Since the DMS did not itself constitute signalling equipment under Heading 8512, the Controller Assembly was not accepted as a part of Heading 8512 goods. It was also found not to fall under any specific heading of Chapter 85, and was consequently treated as a motor-vehicle part under Heading 8708.

Conclusion: The Controller Assembly is not classifiable under CTI 8512 90 00 and is classifiable under CTI 8708 99 00.

Final Conclusion: The ruling granted relief only in relation to the Cable, while the Unit Assembly and Controller Assembly were held to fall outside Heading 8512 and were placed under the residual motor-vehicle parts heading.

Ratio Decidendi: A component that is expressly covered by a specific tariff heading must be classified there, but a sub-assembly that merely captures or processes data without itself emitting the warning or signal required by the heading cannot be treated as signalling equipment and may fall under the residual motor-vehicle parts entry if no specific Chapter 85 heading applies.

---