Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit taken on furnace oil used in the manufacture of D.B.M., an exempted or nil-rated product, was required to be reversed under erstwhile Rule 57CC where the D.B.M. was partly captively consumed for manufacture of dutiable final products and partly stock-transferred within the same manufacturer.
Analysis: Rule 57CC was held to govern the adjustment of credit in relation to exempted or nil-rated final products, but its mechanism was confined to inputs other than fuel. The judgment distinguished between D.B.M. as an intermediate product consumed within the same entity and D.B.M. cleared as a final product. It was found that where the fuel was used in producing D.B.M. and all downstream final products were dutiable, the credit chain did not require reversal merely because the intermediate product itself was exempt or cleared without sale. The later authority on non-fuel inputs was held inapplicable to the present controversy concerning fuel inputs.
Conclusion: Credit availed on furnace oil used for manufacturing D.B.M. was not liable to be reversed, and the reference question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 57CC does not require reversal of Modvat credit on fuel inputs used in producing an exempted intermediate product when the ultimate final products are dutiable and the fuel input falls outside the adjustment mechanism of the rule.