Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's claim for refund of Integrated Goods and Services Tax paid on exports was required to be processed under Rule 96 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, notwithstanding the rejection of the amendment request under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The exports were undisputed and the refund application specifically sought release of IGST paid on exported goods. The rejection order had proceeded only on Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 and did not examine the claim in the context of Rule 96 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The Court noted that the case did not fall within the withholding situations under Rule 96(4), and that the goods exported were covered by Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. In those circumstances, the refund claim was directed to be dealt with under the GST refund mechanism.
Outcome: The respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim under Rule 96 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, and the matter was kept pending for further orders.