Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a show cause notice uploaded on the GST portal under the wrong head, instead of the prescribed head for notices and orders, amounted to valid service under Section 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; and whether the ex parte adjudication order and consequential recovery notice could survive such defective service.
Analysis: The notice was not uploaded under the head "Notices and Orders" but under "Additional Notices". In these circumstances, the service was held not to be proper or effective. Once the foundation notice itself was not duly served, the petitioner was deprived of a fair opportunity to respond, and the adjudication made on that basis could not be sustained. The recovery notice, being founded on the invalid order, was also unsustainable. The Court also preserved liberty to the authority to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The show cause notice, the adjudication order, and the recovery notice were quashed and set aside, with liberty to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law.