Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings initiated and continued in the name of a deceased assessee were valid in law.
Analysis: The legal heir's registration on the Income Tax Portal had already been approved and the department's records reflected the death of the assessee before the reopening notices and consequential orders were issued. Notice under section 148A(b), the order under section 148A(d), and the notice under section 148 were all issued in the name of the deceased. Such initiation of proceedings against a dead person was held to strike at the root of jurisdiction and was treated as a substantive illegality, not a mere procedural irregularity. Once the foundational notice was invalid, the later reassessment steps could not survive.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were quashed as invalid, and the assessee succeeded on the jurisdictional challenge.