Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash deposits made in the assessee's bank account for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18 could be assessed as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite the assessee furnishing cash flow statements, debtor details and sale records to explain the source of deposits.
Analysis: The assessee explained the deposits as arising from business receipts, cash realised from debtors and redeposit of cash withdrawn from the bank. The explanation was supported by month-wise cash flow statements and supporting transaction details. The Department did not carry out independent verification of the material produced and did not bring any contrary evidence to show an undisclosed source of income. In the absence of a rebuttal to the explanation offered, and having accepted the assessee's business activity, the cash deposits could not be treated as unexplained merely on suspicion or on the ground that the deposits were made during the demonetisation period.
Conclusion: The addition under section 69A was held unsustainable and was deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee furnishes a plausible and supported explanation for cash deposits and the Revenue fails to rebut it by enquiry or contrary evidence, the deposits cannot be taxed as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.