Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty paid under the Technical License Contract Agreement for use of technical documentation and know-how was liable to service tax as intellectual property right service under Section 65(55a) and Section 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The agreement granted a non-exclusive and non-transferable right to use technical documentation and know-how for manufacturing, assembling, procuring components, developing improvements and distributing the licensed products. The payment was therefore for technical know-how and documentation, not for any trademark, design, patent or other intellectual property right covered by Indian law. The Board's clarification also stated that only intellectual property rights recognized under Indian law for the time being in force were taxable, and that intangible rights not so covered would not fall within the taxable service. On the record, no material showed that the royalty was paid for a taxable intellectual property right.
Conclusion: The royalty payments did not constitute taxable intellectual property right service and the service tax demand was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the demand, along with consequential liability, was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Royalty paid for mere technical know-how and documentation, without transfer or licensing of an intellectual property right recognized under Indian law, does not attract service tax as intellectual property right service.