Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should be entertained after the discrepancy in the GST summary order was rectified, and whether the petitioner should be permitted to pursue the appellate remedy against the order-in-original.
Analysis: The discrepancy between the order-in-original and Form GST DRC-07 was rectified during the pendency of the writ petition. The Court also noted that the order-in-original imposed tax, interest and penalty under Sections 74 and 122 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In these circumstances, the Court considered it appropriate to leave the petitioner to work out the statutory appellate remedy, subject to filing an appeal with an application for condonation of delay and the required pre-deposit.
Outcome: The writ petition was disposed of by granting liberty to file an appeal with delay condonation and statutory pre-deposit, and no opinion was expressed on the merits.