Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to credit of tax deducted at source despite not showing the corresponding receipts as taxable income in the return, where the income was claimed to be not chargeable to tax in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: The return was initially flagged as defective because the TDS claim exceeded the income disclosed, and the assessee explained that the receipts were not taxable in India under the treaty. The return was nevertheless processed under section 143(1)(a) accepting nil income, and the defect was not treated as invalid. On these facts, the credit of TDS was required to follow the income to which it related, and Rule 37BA supported allowance of credit in the relevant year to the person in whose hands the income was assessable. Since the income itself was accepted as not taxable in India, denial of the associated TDS credit was not justified.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the TDS credit of Rs. 9,01,972 and the denial of such credit was unsustainable.