Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported knee, hip and shoulder implant systems and component parts are classifiable under tariff item 90211000 as orthopaedic appliances, tariff item 90213100 as artificial joints, tariff item 90213900 as other artificial parts of the body, or any other tariff item; (ii) Whether the goods are eligible for exemption under Sr. No. 385 of Notification No. 45/2025-Cus dated 24.10.2025, particularly under Entry B(1) or Entry E(9) of List 21.
Issue (i): Whether the imported knee, hip and shoulder implant systems and component parts are classifiable under tariff item 90211000 as orthopaedic appliances, tariff item 90213100 as artificial joints, tariff item 90213900 as other artificial parts of the body, or any other tariff item
Analysis: Heading 9021 and Chapter Note 6 distinguish orthopaedic appliances from artificial parts of the body. Orthopaedic appliances are devices that prevent or correct deformities or support existing body parts after illness, operation or injury, whereas artificial joints and related prosthetic parts are implantable replacements that wholly or partially replace defective anatomical structures. The tariff separately provides for orthopaedic or fracture appliances, artificial joints, other artificial parts of the body and residuary goods, and the HSN Explanatory Notes support this distinction. Classification depends on the objective character of the goods as imported, not on the medical specialty in which they are used. Complete prosthetic joint assemblies fall under artificial joints, while implantable components such as stems, cups, liners and similar parts fall under other artificial parts of the body.
Conclusion: Complete knee, hip and shoulder replacement systems are classifiable under tariff item 90213100, and individual implantable components are classifiable under tariff item 90213900. None of the subject goods are classifiable under tariff item 90211000.
Issue (ii): Whether the goods are eligible for exemption under Sr. No. 385 of Notification No. 45/2025-Cus dated 24.10.2025, particularly under Entry B(1) or Entry E(9) of List 21
Analysis: Entry B(1) extends the exemption only to orthopaedic appliances falling under heading 90.21, and not to all goods of heading 9021. Since the subject goods are classifiable as artificial joints or other artificial parts of the body, they do not answer the description of orthopaedic appliances. Entry E(9) covers implants for severely physically handicapped patients, but the present notification omits the earlier language relating to joint replacement and spinal implants. That omission must be given effect, and the earlier exemption decisions rendered under materially different notifications cannot be mechanically applied. The applicant did not establish that the goods are specially intended for the narrower class of severely physically handicapped patients contemplated by the notification. Exemption entries must be construed strictly.
Conclusion: The goods are not eligible for exemption under Entry B(1) or Entry E(9) of List 21 and are not entitled to exemption under Sr. No. 385 of Notification No. 45/2025-Cus dated 24.10.2025.
Final Conclusion: The ruling classifies the complete replacement systems under tariff item 90213100 and the separate implantable components under tariff item 90213900, and denies the claimed customs exemption under Notification No. 45/2025-Cus.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff heading separately provides for artificial joints and other artificial parts of the body, implantable prosthetic replacements must be classified by their specific tariff description and cannot be treated as orthopaedic appliances merely because they are used in orthopaedic treatment; exemption notifications must then be applied strictly according to their express terms, without supplying omitted words or enlarging the entry by implication.