Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of long-term capital loss claimed on sale of jointly owned property, including indexed cost of acquisition and related documentary evidence, was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee's claim arose from purchase and sale of the same property in identical factual circumstances as those accepted in the scrutiny assessment of the assessee's husband. The record also showed supporting documents for the acquisition payments and the computation of the claimed long-term capital loss. In these circumstances, the Department was not justified in taking a contradictory view on the same transaction and the disallowance could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The disallowance was deleted and the claim of long-term capital loss of Rs. 2,94,41,694/- was allowed in favour of the assessee.